|
2.3. Nuclear waste
The earlier measurements show that there is visible
suspicion towards nuclear waste. Today, about every third person (32%)
considers that the disposal of nuclear waste in the Finnish bedrock is
safe. The number of suspicious people is greater, more than two fifths
(44%) of the population. Despite the scepticism, these figures indicate
the greatest confidence throughout the follow-up period. However, the
difference compared to the average level in the past few years is, as a
matter of fact, minor [Figure 8.].
The reservations are partly explained by the fact that two thirds (65%)
consider nuclear waste to be a continuous threat to the life of future
generations. Even in the light of this indicator, the concern about waste
has decreased from the previous measurement (72% agreed with this view).
However, the trend in the attitudes throughout the study period indicates
that the threat experiences are persistent; no great slackening has been
seen in attitudes in the past 20 years [Figure 9.].
About two out of five (39%) accept the notion that it would be better to
keep nuclear waste in its present intermediate storage and wait for new
solutions rather than to definitively deposit it in the bedrock. Every
fourth respondent disagrees (27%). 'A reconsideration period' is gradually
less and less supported each year. The overall change from the beginning
of the 90s (62% supported in 1991) is great. It is true, however, that the
interpretation should be made considering the decision made in 1994 to
prohibit the exports of nuclear waste, which restricted the potential
decisions to a narrower range (no figure).
Attitudes towards nuclear waste are, on average, less negative in the
communities where the existing nuclear power plants are located than they
are in the rest of Finland. In both localities there are more who think
that final disposal is safe than regard it to be unsafe. The results in
the earlier sections of the research series should also be remembered in
connection with the examination. They have continuously shown that in
principle the residents of both Eurajoki and Loviisa are prepared to
accept, i.e. dispose of nuclear waste in the area of their own
municipality. At Eurajoki, the probable municipality of waste disposal,
confidence in safe disposal has strengthened further from last year.
|
|